Some people believe that university students should pay the full cost of their studies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that the entire financial burden of a university education should fall on students themselves. I strongly disagree with this view, as heavily subsidised higher education benefits society as a whole and protects equality of opportunity.
The first reason for my position is that a well-educated population is a public good, not merely a private advantage. Graduates become the doctors, engineers and teachers on whom everyone depends, and the taxes they later pay far exceed the cost of their tuition. When Germany abolished tuition fees, for instance, it did so precisely because it viewed skilled graduates as an investment in national prosperity rather than a personal luxury. Requiring students to pay the full cost ignores this collective return.
A second, equally important reason is that full fees would entrench social inequality. If a degree cost tens of thousands of dollars up front, talented students from low-income families would be deterred from applying, while wealthier but less able peers took their places. This is not only unjust to the individuals concerned but also wasteful for the economy, which loses the potential of its brightest citizens. Partial public funding keeps the door to higher education open on the basis of ability rather than wealth.
In conclusion, although students clearly gain personally from their studies, I firmly believe they should not bear the full cost. The wider social and economic benefits of an educated population, together with the need to preserve equal access, make a compelling case for continued public investment in universities.
Why it scores Band 9
- ✓Task Response: a clear position stated in the introduction and sustained throughout; both reasons are fully developed with explanation + a specific example.
- ✓Coherence: one central idea per paragraph, signposted with topic sentences and linkers used naturally, not mechanically.
- ✓Lexical Resource: precise, topic-specific language (“public good”, “entrench social inequality”, “collective return”) rather than memorised phrases.
- ✓Grammar: a range of complex structures (conditionals, relative clauses) used accurately.